Public Notice


Published Nov. 8, 2017
Expiration date: 12/8/2017


Issue Date: November 8, 2017

Comment Deadline: December 8, 2017

Corps Action ID #: SAW-2016-00546

The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from Mr. Greg Miller and Mrs. Emily Miller seeking an After-the-Fact Department of the Army authorization for the discharge of fill material and excavation activity in over 5.0 acres of jurisdictional Waters of the United States on their approximately 111-acre property located in the Town of Atlantic, in the northeast part of Carteret County, North Carolina.

Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at:

Property Owners: Mr. Greg Miller and Mrs. Emily Miller

7628 James River Close

New Albany, Ohio 43054

Agent: Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP

c/o: Mr. Alex Elkan

230 N. Elm Street, Suite 2000

Greensboro, North Carolina 27401


The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory


Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)


Location Description: The project site is located on the north side of the road at #470 Seashore Drive, adjacent to Nelson Bay, in Atlantic, Carteret County, North Carolina.

Project Area (acres): ~111 Nearest Town: Atlantic

Nearest Waterway: Nelson Bay River Basin: White Oak

Latitude and Longitude: 34.88084 N, -76.35941W

Existing Site Conditions

Activities on the property were initiated sometime mid-2015 and the proposed access roads, taxiway, utility line, and the two ponds have been constructed and are in place. There is an existing airstrip, or runway, aligned in a north to south direction, and bisects the 111 acre property. This airstrip was constructed several decades ago and its footprint has recently been built-up with material from the two ponds.

The majority of the surrounding area consists of a typical upland and low terrace of wet Pocosin with upland long leaf pine ridges. Predominate hydric soil types are listed as Murville mucky sand, a very poorly drained soil, and Leon sand, a poorly drained soil. The majority of the drainage flows southward and empties into the tidal waters of Nelson Bay. Vegetation is typical of Pocosin wet communities with canopy trees of Pinus serotina (pond pine), Magnolia virginiana (sweet bay), Persea palustrus (red bay), and Nyssa sylvatica (black gum); subcanopy of Cyrilla racemiflora (titi); and ground cover of Lyonia lucida (fetterbush), Ilex glabra (ink berry), and Smilax laurifolia (laurel leaf greenbrier). Upland ridges consist of Pinus palustrus (long-leaf pine) canopy with Myrica cerifera (wax myrtle) understory and ground cover of Ilex glabra (ink berry) and Aristida stricta (wire grass).

Applicant’s Stated Purpose

Basic: The basic purpose is to utilize the property for recreational aviation and to provide “fly-in” aviation access to the property for the owners and for future periodic charitable use by military veterans and their families.

Overall: The goal of the project improvements is to: (1) maintain and improve safety associated with the use of the existing grass airstrip for aircraft take-off, taxi, and landing purposes; (2) construct infrastructure to access and use upland areas of their property; (3) provide infrastructure fire protection; (4) maintain the pond, which was excavated for material use to build up the pre-existing runway, for irrigational and recreational purposes; and (5) develop the property as a “fly-in/fly-out” residential and recreational property for personal and periodic charitable use by military veterans and their families.

Project Description

The applicant proposes to retain the perimeter roads, taxiway, hangar access road, and both ponds for the purposes above and plans to restore impacted wetlands at various locations. It should be noted that there are some discrepancies between the Corps’ initial findings and information in the application regarding the exact amount of existing wetland impacts and acreage being proposed. In 2016, the applicant employed a wetland consultant to delineate the Waters of the U.S. on the entire 111-acre property; however, our office has not verified the accuracy of this jurisdictional boundary.

Perimeter Roads: The applicant proposes to retain the perimeter roads that traverse the southwestern, western, and northern property boundaries and that currently impact approximately 1.57 acres of wetlands. These roads vary in width from 20 to 33 feet and are to have dual purposes: provide access to future cabin sites for wounded/disabled veterans and storage facilities and provide fire and life safety protection throughout the property. Plans are to reduce the road footprint to a 12-13 foot top width with a 2:1 side slope and to restore the remaining wetlands by removing the additional fill material to original elevations.

Taxiway: Plans include retaining the existing taxiway, which will provide airplane access from the runway to the proposed hangar site. This access runs north and south from the proposed hangar site to the northern end of the runway. The connection access is approximately 20 feet wide and currently has impacted approximately 0.23 acre of jurisdictional wetlands. The applicant proposes to reduce the footprint of impacted wetlands to 0.12 acre, which is a minimum design in order to conform to “Design Standards Based on TDG” contained in FAA Advisory Circular 150/5300-13A, and the remaining wetlands will be restored back to original grade via the removal of existing fill material.

Hangar Access Road: The purpose of this existing road is to provide safe access in the most direct and shortest route from the hangar to the airstrip without interference with the safe airplane access of the Taxiway. The access would also allow a fire- and life-safety requirement for access to the hangar and irrigation pond in the event of an aircraft failure on the taxiway that would otherwise block access. The current road has impacted approximately 0.16 acre of wetlands and plans are to narrow the road surface to 12-13 feet wide with a 2:1 slope to reduce the impacts to approximately 0.04 acre of wetlands.

Recreational/Irrigational Pond: The initial use of the ponds was to provide material to improve the existing onsite runway by elevating its footprint several feet high and to irrigate the ground cover for stabilization. The footprint of the Upper Pond has impacted over 2.0 acres, including perimeter fill, and the total impacts associated with the Lower Pond has yet to be determined due to current conditions. It should be noted that the majority of the Lower Pond was excavated in uplands.

Over 0.5 acre of stockpile material, mostly overburden from the ponds, was placed in jurisdictional wetlands in a location adjacent to the Upper Pond. The applicant proposes to restore the wetlands in this area by removing the material back to the original wetland contours.

Avoidance and Minimization

The applicant provided the following information in support of efforts to avoid and/or minimize impacts to the aquatic environment: With the configuration and amount of wetlands on the property, access to the upland cabin sites are unable to be constructed in a practicable manner to avoid wetland impacts and there are no available high ground options to practicably connect the hangar site with the taxiway and hangar access roads without impacting wetlands. The perimeter roads, taxiway, and hangar access road are being proposed to the minimum width in order to reduce wetland impacts while providing safe passageways. The applicant states that the reduction of the length, number, and/or connectivity or configuration of the proposed roadways would greatly diminish the ability to use the various upland areas of the property for guest cabins and maintenance, storage, and recreational buildings and facilities. In investigating an alternative for fire protection/irrigation, a groundwater well was determined to be susceptible to depletion (aka dry well) by fire pump trucks in the event of emergency fire protection calls.

Compensatory Mitigation

The applicant offers to create approximately 2.4 acres of wetlands onsite as compensatory mitigation to offset unavoidable functional loss to the aquatic environment. Several areas have been identified as potential onsite wetland creation sites. Plans are to convert uplands to wetlands via the introduction of ditches through Leon/Murville soil “uplands” located near jurisdictional wetlands. Two specific locations of these wetland creation opportunities have the  characteristics of 1) being directly adjacent fire plow lines, 2) having topographic relief of less than 12 inches, and 3) being completely surrounded by wetlands. In addition to this creation approach, the applicant is offering to create approximately 1.08 acres of littoral shelf emergent wetland within the southern half of the Upper Pond. Material for this proposed creation would originate from the stockpile material area that is planned for removal in order to restore the over 0.5 acre area adjacent to the pond.

Essential Fish Habitat

Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps’ initial determination is that the proposed project would not effect EFH or associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service.

Cultural Resources

Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33 CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:

No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are present within the Corps’ permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).

The District Engineer’s final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon coordination with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on historic properties within the Corps-identified permit area.

The applicant provided SHPO with information on this proposal and SHPO’s office replied on October 18, 2017 stating that they “are aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project”, adding no further comment.

Endangered Species

Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information:

The Corps is not aware of the presence of species listed as threatened or endangered or their critical habitat formally designated pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) within the project area. The Corps will make a final determination on the effects of the proposed project upon additional review of the project and completion of any necessary biological assessment and/or consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service.

Other Required Authorizations

The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State agencies for review.

North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by January 08, 2018 to:

NCDWR Central Office

Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit

(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617


(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):

The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies with and would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a Department of Army (DA) permit for the proposed work until the applicant submits such a certification to the Corps and the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the applicant’s consistency certification. As the application did not include the consistency certification, the Corps will request, upon receipt,, concurrence or objection from the NCDCM.


The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection Agency’s 404(b)(1) guidelines.

Commenting Information

The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of he Governor; Indian Tribes an  other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate he impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing will be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing. The Corps is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials, including any consolidated State viewpoint or written position of the Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the applicant’s proposal. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers in evaluating the approval of this permit request. To make this decision, all factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and in general, the needs and welfare of the people.The Corps has reviewed the prospectus and has examined all information provided by the applicant. Our preliminary review indicates the following: 1) An Environmental Impact Statement will not be required; 2) No listed species of fish, wildlife, and/or plant species (or Critical Habitat) under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 is expected to be impacted; 3) There are no potential cultural or historic resources located within the proposed project site; and 4) There are no Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) areas within the subject bank. A “no effect” determination for threatened and endangered species and for cultural and/or historic resources has been made at this time; and it has been determined that no additional EFH evaluation will be conducted. Any additional or new information may change any of these preliminary findings.

Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above and as described in the prospectus, will be received by the Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District, until 5pm, December 8, 2017. Comments should be submitted to Mr. Mickey Sugg, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina 28403, or via internet at If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Sugg at (910) 251-4811.