PUBLIC NOTICE
Issue Date: October 10, 2017
Comment Deadline: November 09, 2017
Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2016-00981
The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received information from the
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) regarding a potential future
requirement for Department of the Army authorization to discharge dredged or fill
material into waters of the United States, associated with the replacement of Bridge No.
360 on US 29 and improvements to the existing interchange at SR 4771 (Reedy Fork
Parkway) (STIP Project Number R-4707) in Guilford County, North Carolina.
Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached
plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington
District Web Site at
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx
Applicant: North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
Project Development Group
Attn: Derrick Weaver, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Authority
The Corps will evaluate this application to compare alternatives that have been carried
forward for detailed study pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory
Authorities:
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)
In order to more fully integrate Section 404 permit requirements with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and to give careful consideration to our required
public interest review and 404(b)(1) compliance determination, the Corps is soliciting
public comment on the merits of this proposal and on the alternatives considered. At the
close of this comment period, the District Commander will evaluate and consider the
comments received, as well as the expected adverse and beneficial effects of the proposed
road construction, to select the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative
(LEDPA). The District Commander is not authorizing construction of the proposed
project at this time. A final DA permit may be issued only after our review process is
complete, impacts to the aquatic environment have been minimized to the maximum
extent practicable, and a compensatory mitigation plan for unavoidable impacts has been
approved.
Location
Location Description:
Project Area (acres): ~525
Nearest Town: Greensboro
Nearest Waterway: Unnamed Tributary at Camp Herman
River Basin: Cape Fear
Latitude and Longitude: 36.173055 N, -79.713599W
The proposed project is located in northeastern Guilford County, approximately 8 miles
northeast of downtown Greensboro, North Carolina. The study area boundary for this
project encompasses the proposed transportation improvements and consists of
approximately 525 acres (Figure 1).
The proposed project, in addition to replacing Bridge No. 360 over US 29, would also
include the realignment and upgrade of the existing SR 4771 (Reedy Fork Parkway) and
SR 2526 (Summit Avenue).
Existing Site Conditions
Guilford County is located within the piedmont region of central North Carolina. The
project is located in the northern fringes of Greensboro, where historically rural
agricultural land use is transitioning to residential and commercial developments. The
Reedy Fork Ranches residential development is located on the east side of the existing
interchange, whereas several commercial businesses, a municipal golf course, and Lake
Townsend are on the west side of the interchange. The roadways to be improved as part
of the proposed project include US 29 (Principle arterial freeway) running north/south,
Summit Avenue (Minor arterial) on the west side of interchange, and Reedy Fork
Parkway (Local road) which crosses from Summit Avenue over US 29 and continues
east. US 29 is a four-lane, median-divided freeway that connects I-40 in Greensboro with US
58 in Danville, Virginia. US 29 has partial control of access with periodic median breaks
and driveway cuts. The existing right-of-way is 250 feet wide along US 29. The SR 2565
(Hicone Road) Interchange is approximately 2 miles south of the Reedy Fork Parkway
Interchange. To the north approximately 3 miles is the NC 150 Interchange. The current
posted speed on US 29 is 55 miles per hour (MPH).
Summit Avenue is a minor arterial roadway that generally runs parallel to US 29 in the
project vicinity. The facility runs from downtown Greensboro in the south to NC 150 in
the north. Summit Avenue is a two-lane road with unpaved shoulders south of Bryan
Park Road and has three lanes with shoulders from Bryan Park Road north to Reedy Fork
Parkway. North of Reedy Fork Parkway it returns to a two-lane highway with unpaved
shoulders. The existing right-of-way is 100 feet wide until just before Morrisette Paper
and Packaging Company where it narrows to 60 feet as it continues north. The US 29
southbound ramps currently intersect with Summit Avenue. The posted speed limit is 45
MPH.
Reedy Fork Parkway is primarily a two-lane, median-divided local facility with curb-andgutter
through the Reedy Fork Ranch Development. It begins at its intersection with
Summit Avenue to the west of US 29, then crosses over US 29, intersects with Eckerson
Road, and continues to Turner Smith Road. The existing right-of-way along Reedy Fork
Parkway is 68 feet wide. There are sidewalks along the south side of the roadway east
from Eckerson Road to Reedy Fork Elementary School. The speed limit is 35 MPH.
The project study area is contained within the Cape Fear River Basin, part of the U.S.
Geological Survey (USGS) Hydrologic Unit 03030002. Based on a delineation by
NCDOT, there are 20 streams, 6 other surface waters (ponds), and 12 wetlands within the
Study Area; all are potential waters of the U.S. All of the streams identified within the
project area, which include Reedy Fork and Unnamed Tributary at Camp Herman, and
several unnamed tributaries, have been assigned a primary water resources class
classification of “WS-V; NSW.” “WS-V” refers to those waters protected as water
supplies which are generally upstream and draining to Class WS-IV waters, waters used
by industry to supply their employees with drinking water, or as waters formerly used as
water supply; these waters are also protected for Class C uses. “NSW” is a supplemental
classification intended for waters needing additional nutrient management due to being
subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. A field
verification for NCDOT’s delineation is scheduled for October 2017; as such, the
location and extent of potential waters of the US are subject to change.
There are no designated anadromous fish waters, Primary Nursery Areas (PNA), or trout
waters present in the Study Area. There are no designated High Quality Waters (HQW),
Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW), or water supply watersheds (WS-I or WS-II)
within 1.0-mile downstream of the Study Area. No streams located within a 1.0-mile
radius of the Study Area were found on the North Carolina 2014 Final 303(d) List of
Impaired Waters. No waters within the Study Area have been identified by the North
Carolina Wildlife Resource Commission (NCWRC) as trout waters; therefore, no
moratoria are anticipated for the proposed project. The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) has not identified any streams within the Study Area as an Essential Fish
Habitat. There are no streams within the Study Area determined by the USACE as
Navigable Waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act.
Applicant’s Stated Purpose
The primary purposes of the proposed project are to:
replace a structurally deficient bridge over US 29;
improve the existing US 29 / Reedy Fork Parkway Interchange to meet interstate
standards;
accommodate the future traffic volumes generated from the Reedy Fork Ranches
mixed use development.
Project Description
NCDOT proposes a bridge replacement and an improvement to the existing interchange
on US 29 at SR 4771 (Reedy Fork Parkway) in Guilford County. The proposed project
would also include the realignment, part on new location, and upgrade of the existing SR
4771 (Reedy Fork Parkway) and SR 2526 (Summit Avenue).
The Build Alternatives under consideration for R-4707 consist of three interchange
configurations. Each interchange configuration would meet the project’s purpose and
need by providing a new bridge and improved interchange.
Detailed Study Alternatives (DSA)
Build Alternative 1: Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) - The SPUI Alternative
involves the signalization of three intersections on Reedy Fork Parkway between Summit
Avenue and Eckerson Road (Figure 2). Summit Avenue would be realigned to tie into the
realigned and extended Reedy Fork Parkway forming a signalized four-leg intersection.
For this alternative, three intersections would be signalized along Reedy Fork Parkway
between Summit Avenue and the proposed Service Road connecting Reedy Fork
Parkway to existing land uses along US 29.
Build Alternative 1 Revised: Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) – A diverging
diamond interchange (DDI) is a type of diamond interchange in which the two directions
of traffic from US 29 cross to the opposite side on both sides of the bridge at the
interchange (Figure 3).
Build Alternative 2: Partial Cloverleaf Interchange – The partial cloverleaf interchange
includes a loop and a ramp in the southeast and southwest quadrants of the proposed
Reedy Fork Road Interchange (Figure 4). The ramp terminals connect with planned
roadways on the north side of Reedy Fork Parkway.
In addition to the three Build Alternatives (i.e., Detailed Study Alternatives), a No-Build
Alternative was also retained as a baseline against which the benefits, costs, and impacts
of the Build Alternatives could be compared. The No-Build Alternative assumed that the
transportation network in the PSA will continue to develop as called for in the 2040 Long
Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), but without R-4707 included.
For construction, right of way, and utilities, the project is estimated to cost a total of
$52.3 million to $57.7 million (2017 dollars). Depending on the DSA, construction costs
range from $35.6 million to $38.6 million, right-of-way costs range from $15.8 million to
$18.4 million, and utility relocation costs range from $0.6 million to $1.0 million.
Impacts to streams are shown in Table 1, below.
Table 1. Summary of Permanent and Temporary Stream Impacts
Build Alternative
Stream Impacts*
(linear feet)
Wetland Impacts
(Acres)
Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) 1,477 0.51
Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) 1,669 0.55
Partial Cloverleaf Interchange (PARCLO) 2,187 0.57
*Based on functional roadway design slope stakes plus 25 feet
Avoidance, Minimization and Compensatory Mitigation
Through development of the preliminary functional designs within the DSAs, NCDOT
has attempted to avoid impacts to streams and wetlands to the greatest practicable extent.
This included developing alignments and interchange configurations for the DSAs that
avoided these resources as much as possible, while also minimizing impacts to other
resources. NCDOT will continue to seek ways to avoid and minimize impacts in further
design efforts for the selected Alternative.
The purpose of compensatory mitigation is to offset unavoidable functional losses to the
aquatic environment resulting from project impacts to waters of the United States.
NCDOT will investigate potential on-site compensatory mitigation opportunities for the
selected alternative. If on-site mitigation is not feasible, NCDOT intends to coordinate
with the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services to provide the required compensatory
mitigation.
Essential Fish Habitat
Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this
Public Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The
Corps’ initial determination is that the proposed project would not effect EFH or
associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Cultural Resources
Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA),
Appendix C of 33 CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for
Implementing Appendix C, the District Engineer consulted district files and records and
the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places and initially
determines that:
Properties ineligible for inclusion in the National Register are present within the
Corps’ permit area; there will be no historic properties affected by the proposed
work. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
Historic properties, or properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register,
are present within the Corps’ permit area; however, the undertaking will have no
adverse effect on these historic properties. The Corps subsequently requests
concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).
The applicant states that coordination with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO) was initiated through a letter dated August 10, 2004. This coordination
was initiated pursuant to the requirements of Section 106 of the NHPA. In a response
letter dated August 31, 2004, the SHPO identified Hardy’s Mill and recommended an
archaeological evaluation to determine its eligibility for listing in the National Register of
Historic Places (National Register) under Criterion D. The letter also mentioned that two
structures of historical or architectural importance are located within the general area of
the proposed project: Reedy Fork Acres (GF 1666) and Hardy’s Mill Pond and Store
Millpond (GF 2056). A field study was completed in 2006 by an NCDOT architectural
historian of the two structures noted in the 2004 letter. Photographs and evaluations of
the properties were reviewed in a SHPO staff meeting held February 2, 2007 where it was
determined that neither site is eligible for inclusion in the National Register of Historic
Places.
The applicant states that an archaeological field investigation was carried out between
October 17, 2016, November 3, 2016, and June 2017 to identify and evaluate
archaeological sites within the defined APE for inclusion in the NRHP. The
investigations identified one small site which was recommended as not eligible for the
NRHP. As such, the applicant states that the project would not impact significant
archaeological resources.
The District Engineer’s final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon
coordination with the SHPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration
given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on historic
properties within the Corps-indentified permit area.
Endangered Species
Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area,
examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North
Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information:
The Corps determines that the proposed project
may affect, not likely to adversely affect federally listed endangered or
threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat.
The Corps initiates consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make
a permit decision until the consultation process is complete. As of March 25,
2015, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) lists one federally protected
species for Guilford County, the small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides).
The applicant has indicated that habitat does exist for this species in the project
area, although no information on surveys for the species were submitted.
Northern Long-Eared Bat. The US Fish and Wildlife Service has developed a
programmatic biological opinion (PBO) in conjunction with FHWA, USACE, and
NCDOT for the northern long-eared bat in eastern North Carolina (which includes Wake
County). The PBO went into effect in 2016 and covers all NCDOT projects and activities
in NCDOT Divisions 1 to 8. The programmatic determination for the bat is “May Affect,
Likely to Adversely Affect”. The PBO involves a research and tracking program to
establish conclusive information concerning the existence of the northern long-eared bat
in the eastern part of North Carolina. The PBO also requires that upon completion of
clearing activities for each project with federal funds, NCDOT will report on the
estimated acres of clearing to the US Fish and Wildlife Service.
Evaluation
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That
decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important
resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal
must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be
relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof;
among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns,
wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values
(in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and
accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety,
food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in
general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of
dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the
activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection
Agency’s 404(b)(1) guidelines.
Commenting Information
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of