Public Notice

SAW-2017-02098

Published Oct. 16, 2017
Expiration date: 11/16/2017

PUBLIC NOTICE

Issue Date: October 16, 2017

Comment Deadline: November 16, 2017

Corps Action ID Number: SAW-2017-02098

The Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers (Corps) received an application from the Town of Nags Head seeking Department of the Army authorization to dredge 4 million cubic yards of beach-quality sediments from two offshore borrow sources, and deposit the material along a 10-mile section of oceanfront shoreline, in the Town Nags Head, Dare County, North Carolina.

Specific plans and location information are described below and shown on the attached plans. This Public Notice and all attached plans are also available on the Wilmington District Web Site at

http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram.aspx

Applicant: Town of Nags Head

Attn: Mr. Cliff Ogburn

5401 S. Croatan Hwy

Nags Head, North Carolina 27959

AGENT (if applicable): Mrs. Haiqing Kaczkowski

Coastal Science & Engineering

160 Gills Creek Parkway

Columbia, South Carolina 29209

Authority

The Corps evaluates this application and decides whether to issue, conditionally issue, or deny the proposed work pursuant to applicable procedures of the following Statutory

Authorities:

Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344)

Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403)

US Army Corps

Of Engineers

Wilmington District

Location

Directions to Site: The project begins with the north terminus at the Bonnet Street Beach Access and continues ten miles south to E. McCall Ct, adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean, in the Town of Nags Head, Dare County, North Carolina.

Project Area (acres): 800 acres Nearest Town: Town of Nags Head

Nearest Waterway: Atlantic Ocean River Basin: Atlantic Ocean

Latitude and Longitude: 35.957453 N, --75.622742 W

Existing Site Conditions

The Town of Nags Head encompasses approximately 11 miles of ocean shoreline on a barrier island located at the northern end of North Carolina’s Outer Banks. Variations in beach sediment grain size vary in the near shore zone, with the majority ranging between 0.17 millimeters (mm) to 0.23 mm. Sediments become coarser proceeding seaward in water depths greater than 30 feet about 1-3 miles offshore. These sediments are thought to be associated with relic deposits from former inlets and barrier ridges from earlier sealevel stands. The near shore zone is highly dynamic with exchanges of sand between the bar and the beach, resulting in a predominance of finer type sand. The width of the berm of the island’s dune system varies considerably with location along the town’s beach and with the season. A previous beach nourishment action was completed in 2011 which deposited more than 4.6 million cubic yards of sediment on the beach front. Since the activity, three major storms have impacted the area resulting in a loss of 1.43 million cubic yards of material. Erosion losses vary significantly from north to south throughout the project area.

Beach and terrestrial communities are considered sparsely populated due to the harsh conditions, including salt spray, wind, shifting sands, and soils with low water retention. Extensive coastal development is another factor that could limit species diversity and abundance. Vegetation along the uppermost portions of the dry beach includes beach spurge, sea rocket, and pennywort. The upper dune areas are more stabilized with vegetation consisting of American beach grass, panic grass, sea oats, broom straw, and salt meadow hay. Organisms in the high-energy sandy inter-tidal zones include mole crabs, coquina clams, amphipods, isopods, and polychaetes. These species are not commercially important, but serve as an important food source for surf-feeding fish and shore birds. According to data collected from the project area, the invertebrate community of the inter-tidal beaches is strongly seasonal.

Applicant’s Stated Purpose

The purpose of the proposed action is to facilitate a long-term shoreline management program to sustain the eroding beach and provide support to a significant portion of the local economy and maintain local and regional tax bases. In order to accomplish this goal, the Town is proposing to maintain its oceanfront beach and dune system to a configuration that will: (1) restore sand losses due to chronic erosion and recent storms; (2) provide a higher level of storm protection (3) provide a wider recreational beach and create habitats for wildlife, (4) address high erosion rates at the south end of Nags Head. (5) integrate a dune management plan into the renourishment design and (6) maintain Nags Head’s eligibility for future FEMA community assistance funds.

Project Description

The proposed action will include sand placement along a 10-mile section of the Town’s oceanfront shoreline. Beach quality sand would be dredged using a self-contained ocean certified hopper dredge and/or a hydraulic pipeline dredge. Material will be obtained from two borrow areas located 1.0-2.5 miles offshore of Nags Head. Borrow Areas 3A  and 4 encompass 490 acres and contain over 6 million cubic yards of sand. Placement onto the beach would be accomplished via submerged pipeline with direct pump-out. Once discharged, the sand will be shaped and graded according to the design template using earth-moving equipment such as bulldozers and excavators. The average fill density (volume of nourishment per linear foot of beach) is 75 cubic yards per linear foot of shoreline, which is equivalent 

Avoidance and Minimization

An extensive alternatives analysis was performed for this permit as well as the 2011 permit action. This included the evaluation of a no action alternative; a winter dredging alternative, a retreat and relocate alternative; and the preferred alternative. Many alternatives were identified and evaluated through the scoping and pre-application process, and further detailed descriptions of all alternatives may be reviewed in the application and associated applicant prepared Environmental Assessment.

Essential Fish Habitat

Pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, this Public Notice initiates the Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) consultation requirements. The Corps’ initial determination is that the proposed project may affect, but not likely to adversely affect EFH or associated fisheries managed by the South Atlantic or Mid Atlantic Fishery Management Councils or the National Marine Fisheries Service. As part of the pre-application and scoping process, the applicant submitted an EFH assessment to The Nation Marine Fisheries Service for review.

Cultural Resources

Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, Appendix C of 33 CFR Part 325, and the 2005 Revised Interim Guidance for Implementing Appendix C, the District Engineer consulted district files and records and the latest published version of the National Register of Historic Places and initially determines that:

No historic properties, nor properties eligible for inclusion in the National Register, are present within the Corps’ permit area; therefore, there will be no historic properties affected. The Corps subsequently requests concurrence from the SHPO (or THPO).

The District Engineer’s final eligibility and effect determination will be based upon  coordination with the SHPO and/or THPO, as appropriate and required, and with full consideration given to the proposed undertaking’s potential direct and indirect effects on

historic properties within the Corps-indentified permit area.

Endangered Species

Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Corps reviewed the project area, examined all information provided by the applicant and consulted the latest North Carolina Natural Heritage Database. Based on available information:

The Corps determines that the proposed project may affect, not likely to adversely affect federally listed endangered or threatened species or their formally designated critical habitat. The Corps initiates consultation under Section 7 of the ESA and will not make a permit decision until the consultation process is complete.

Other Required Authorizations

The Corps forwards this notice and all applicable application materials to the appropriate State agencies for review.

North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR): The Corps will generally not make a final permit decision until the NCDWR issues, denies, or waives the state Certification as required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (PL 92-500). The receipt of the application and this public notice, combined with the appropriate application fee, at the NCDWR Central Office in Raleigh constitutes initial receipt of an application for a 401 Certification. A waiver will be deemed to occur if the NCDWR fails to act on this request for certification within sixty days of receipt of a complete application. Additional information regarding the 401 Certification may be reviewed at the NCDWR Central Office, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit, 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-2260. All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for a 401 Certification should do so, in writing, by November 7, 2017 to:

NCDWR Central Office

Attention: Ms. Karen Higgins, 401 and Buffer Permitting Unit

(USPS mailing address): 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Or,

(physical address): 512 North Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604

North Carolina Division of Coastal Management (NCDCM):

The application did not include a certification that the proposed work complies with and would be conducted in a manner that is consistent with the approved North Carolina Coastal Zone Management Program. Pursuant to 33 CFR 325.2 (b)(2) the Corps cannot issue a Department of Army (DA) permit for the proposed work until the applicant submits such a certification to the Corps and the NCDCM, and the NCDCM notifies the Corps that it concurs with the applicant’s consistency certification. As the application did not include the consistency certification, the Corps will request, upon receipt, concurrence or objection from the NCDCM.

Evaluation

The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impacts including cumulative impacts of the proposed activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the proposal will be considered including the cumulative effects thereof; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, wetlands, historic properties, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards, flood plain values (in accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shoreline erosion and accretion, recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. For activities involving the discharge of dredged or fill materials in waters of the United States, the evaluation of the impact of the activity on the public interest will include application of the Environmental Protection Agency’s 404(b)(1) guidelines.

Commenting Information

The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local agencies and officials, including any consolidated State Viewpoint or written position of the Governor; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal. To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine the overall public interest of the proposed activity.

Any person may request, in writing, within the comment period specified in this notice, that a public hearing be held to consider the application. Requests for public hearings shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing. Requests for a public hearing shall be granted, unless the District Engineer determines that the issues raised are insubstantial or there is otherwise no valid interest to be served by a hearing.

The Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District will receive written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, until 5pm November 12, 2017. Comments should be submitted to Josh Pelletier, Washington Regulatory Field Office, 2407 West Fifth Street , Washington, North Carolina 27889, at (910) 251-4605.